HR-2019-1725-A-English: Forskjell mellom sideversjoner

Linje 19:

The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was contrary to Lovdata's exclusive right under Section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as decisions were retrieved from a DVD published by Lovdata in 2005 and Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely, because the protection period of 15 years had expired.

The order provides guidance for the balance between the database ~~right~~ under the Copyright Act and freedom of ~~speech~~. The order further provides guidance on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Copyright Act, ~~which~~ applies to ~~works and other rights without protection under~~ the Act.

The order provides guidance for the balance between the database rights under the Copyright Act and freedom of expression. The order further provides guidance on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Copyright Act, that applies to public documents as part of the exercise of public authority, which are not protected by the Copyright Act.

Read more about the Rettspraksis-case here:

@@ Linje 19: / Linje 19: @@
 The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was contrary to Lovdata's exclusive right under Section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as decisions were retrieved from a DVD published by Lovdata in 2005 and Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely, because the protection period of 15 years had expired.
-The order provides guidance for the balance between the database right under the Copyright Act and freedom of speech. The order further provides guidance on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Copyright Act, which applies to works and other rights without protection under the Act.
+The order provides guidance for the balance between the database rights under the Copyright Act and freedom of expression. The order further provides guidance on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Copyright Act, that applies to public documents as part of the exercise of public authority, which are not protected by the Copyright Act.
 Read more about the Rettspraksis-case here: