HR-2019-1725-A-English: Forskjell mellom sideversjoner

Linje 6:

|Sammendrag=The case concerns a second-tier appeal against an interim measure prohibiting, among other things, the publication of Supreme Court rulings extracted from Lovdata’s databases. The issue at stake is whether the freedom of expression entails restrictions on the protection of databases under the Copyright Act.

The Lovdata Foundation waived most of the original claim in the second round in the ~~District~~ Court. Thus, a dispute remained over the Supreme Court decisions for the period 2003-2007 and question about legal costs.

The Lovdata Foundation waived most of the original claim in the second round in the County Court. Thus, a dispute remained over the Supreme Court decisions for the period 2003-2007 and question about legal costs.

The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was in violation of Lovdata's exclusive right under section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as the Supreme Court rulings were exported from a DVD published by Lovdata in 2005 or Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely because the database protection period of 15 years had expired.

@@ Linje 6: / Linje 6: @@
 |Sammendrag=The case concerns a second-tier appeal against an interim measure prohibiting, among other things, the publication of Supreme Court rulings extracted from Lovdata’s databases. The issue at stake is whether the freedom of expression entails restrictions on the protection of databases under the Copyright Act.
-The Lovdata Foundation waived most of the original claim in the second round in the District Court. Thus, a dispute remained over the Supreme Court decisions for the period 2003-2007 and question about legal costs.
+The Lovdata Foundation waived most of the original claim in the second round in the County Court. Thus, a dispute remained over the Supreme Court decisions for the period 2003-2007 and question about legal costs.
 The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was in violation of Lovdata's exclusive right under section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as the Supreme Court rulings were exported from a DVD published by Lovdata in 2005 or Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely because the database protection period of 15 years had expired.