HR-2019-1725-A-English: Forskjell mellom sideversjoner

Linje 8:

The Lovdata Foundation waived most of the original claim in the second round in the County Court. Thus, a dispute remained over the Supreme Court decisions for the period 2003-2007 and question about legal costs.

The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was in violation of Lovdata's exclusive right under section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as the Supreme Court rulings were exported from a DVD ~~published~~ by Lovdata in 2005 or Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely because the database protection period of 15 years had expired.

The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was in violation of Lovdata's exclusive right under section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as the Supreme Court rulings were exported from a DVD released by Lovdata in 2005 or Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely because the database protection period of 15 years had expired.

The Copyright Act is based on international sources of law and reflects the legislature's deliberate weighing of the rights holders' legitimate rights on the one hand and freedom of expression on the other. The issue of freedom of expression in this case could not overrule the clear provisions of the law.

@@ Linje 8: / Linje 8: @@
 The Lovdata Foundation waived most of the original claim in the second round in the County Court. Thus, a dispute remained over the Supreme Court decisions for the period 2003-2007 and question about legal costs.
-The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was in violation of Lovdata's exclusive right under section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as the Supreme Court rulings were exported from a DVD published by Lovdata in 2005 or Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely because the database protection period of 15 years had expired.
+The Supreme Court concluded that extraction and making available on the internet the material in question was in violation of Lovdata's exclusive right under section 24 of the Copyright Act as far as the Supreme Court rulings were exported from a DVD released by Lovdata in 2005 or Lovdata's online databases. It was agreed that material retrieved from a CD released by Lovdata in 2002 could be used freely because the database protection period of 15 years had expired.
 The Copyright Act is based on international sources of law and reflects the legislature's deliberate weighing of the rights holders' legitimate rights on the one hand and freedom of expression on the other. The issue of freedom of expression in this case could not overrule the clear provisions of the law.