HR-2019-1725-A-English: Forskjell mellom sideversjoner

Linje 25:

The Supreme Court states the ruling provides guidance for the weighing between the database rights protected by Section 24 of the Copyright Act and the freedom of expression. Furthermore, it provides guidance on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Copyright Act, which applies to public documents and other rights without protection under the Copyright Act.

The decision means that you can update a database once every 15th year and the entire database will still ~~be protected by~~ the Copyright Act. That includes the Norwegian governments own websites (Stortinget.no, Regjeringen.no etc.) containing public information and all other websites.

The decision means that you can update a database once every 15th year and the entire database will still have database protection under the Copyright Act. That includes the Norwegian governments own websites (Stortinget.no, Regjeringen.no etc.) containing public information and all other websites.

The Supreme Court did not consider the consequences deleting Supreme Court decisions will have for individuals, democracy, the rule of law and society. They neighter decided whether Lovdata is a public body, the fact that Lovdata was the exclusive recipient of Supreme Court decisions until 2008 (monopoly) or whether the [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31996L0009 PSI directive] is properly incorporated into Norwegian laws. Nor did Rettspraksis.no's arguments for being exempted from legal costs got an assessment, cf. the [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section20-2 Dispute Act (2005) Section 20-2 (3)].

@@ Linje 25: / Linje 25: @@
 The Supreme Court states the ruling provides guidance for the weighing between the database rights protected by Section 24 of the Copyright Act and the freedom of expression. Furthermore, it provides guidance on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Copyright Act, which applies to public documents and other rights without protection under the Copyright Act.
-The decision means that you can update a database once every 15th year and the entire database will still be protected by the Copyright Act. That includes the Norwegian governments own websites (Stortinget.no, Regjeringen.no etc.) containing public information and all other websites.
+The decision means that you can update a database once every 15th year and the entire database will still have database protection under the Copyright Act. That includes the Norwegian governments own websites (Stortinget.no, Regjeringen.no etc.) containing public information and all other websites.
 The Supreme Court did not consider the consequences deleting Supreme Court decisions will have for individuals, democracy, the rule of law and society. They neighter decided whether Lovdata is a public body, the fact that Lovdata was the exclusive recipient of Supreme Court decisions until 2008 (monopoly) or whether the [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31996L0009 PSI directive] is properly incorporated into Norwegian laws. Nor did Rettspraksis.no's arguments for being exempted from legal costs got an assessment, cf. the [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section20-2 Dispute Act (2005) Section 20-2 (3)].