HR-2019-1725-A-English: Forskjell mellom sideversjoner

Linje 45:

| [https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-40/§14 Copyright Act (2018) Section 14], [https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-40/§24 Section 24], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/1814-05-17/a100 Constitution of Norway (1814) Article 100], [https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-05-21-30/emke/a10 European Convention on Human Rights Article 10], [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31996L0009 EUs directive on the legal protection of databases 1996/9/EF], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section15-8 Dispute Act (2005) Section 15-8], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section20-2 Section 20-2], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section30-6 Section 30-6], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section34-1 Section 34-1]

|}

(1) Justice Thyness: The case concerns a second-tier appeal against an interim measure prohibiting, among other things, the publication of Supreme Court rulings extracted from Lovdata’s databases. The issue at stake is whether the freedom of expression entails restrictions on the protection of databases under the Copyright Act.

(1) Justice [[Erik Thyness|Thyness]]: The case concerns a second-tier appeal against an interim measure prohibiting, among other things, the publication of Supreme Court rulings extracted from Lovdata’s databases. The issue at stake is whether the freedom of expression entails restrictions on the protection of databases under the Copyright Act.

(2) Background

Linje 303:

2. Fredrik Ljone and Håkon Wium Lie are jointly and severally to pay costs to Lovdata in the County Court, in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court of NOK 773 200 – sevenhundredandseventythreethousandtwohundred – within 2 – two – weeks of the service of this order.

(76) Justice Arntzen: I agree with Justice Thyness in all material respects and with his conclusion.

(76) Justice [[Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen|Arntzen]]: I agree with Justice Thyness in all material respects and with his conclusion.

(77) Justice Bull: Likewise.

(77) Justice [[Henrik Bull|Bull]]: Likewise.

(78) Justice Ringnes: Likewise.

(78) Justice [[Arne Ringnes|Ringnes]]: Likewise.

(79) Justice Indreberg: Likewise.

(79) Justice [[Hilde Indreberg|Indreberg]]: Likewise.

(80) Following the voting the Supreme Court gave this

@@ Linje 45: / Linje 45: @@
 | [https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-40/§14 Copyright Act (2018) Section 14], [https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-40/§24 Section 24], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/1814-05-17/a100 Constitution of Norway (1814) Article 100], [https://lovdata.no/lov/1999-05-21-30/emke/a10 European Convention on Human Rights Article 10], [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31996L0009 EUs directive on the legal protection of databases 1996/9/EF], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section15-8 Dispute Act (2005) Section 15-8], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section20-2 Section 20-2], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section30-6 Section 30-6], [https://lovdata.no/NLE/lov/2005-06-17-90/§section34-1 Section 34-1]
 |}
-(1) Justice <b>Thyness</b>: The case concerns a second-tier appeal against an interim measure prohibiting, among other things, the publication of Supreme Court rulings extracted from Lovdata’s databases. The issue at stake is whether the freedom of expression entails restrictions on the protection of databases under the Copyright Act.
+(1) Justice <b>[[Erik Thyness|Thyness]]</b>: The case concerns a second-tier appeal against an interim measure prohibiting, among other things, the publication of Supreme Court rulings extracted from Lovdata’s databases. The issue at stake is whether the freedom of expression entails restrictions on the protection of databases under the Copyright Act.
 (2) <b>Background</b>
@@ Linje 303: / Linje 303: @@
 . Fredrik Ljone and Håkon Wium Lie are jointly and severally to pay costs to Lovdata in the County Court, in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court of NOK 773 200 – sevenhundredandseventythreethousandtwohundred – within 2 – two – weeks of the service of this order.
-(76) Justice <b>Arntzen</b>: I agree with Justice Thyness in all material respects and with his conclusion.
+(76) Justice <b>[[Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen|Arntzen]]</b>: I agree with Justice Thyness in all material respects and with his conclusion.
-(77) Justice <b>Bull</b>: Likewise.
+(77) Justice <b>[[Henrik Bull|Bull]]</b>: Likewise.
-(78) Justice <b>Ringnes</b>: Likewise.
+(78) Justice <b>[[Arne Ringnes|Ringnes]]</b>: Likewise.
-(79) Justice <b>Indreberg</b>: Likewise.
+(79) Justice <b>[[Hilde Indreberg|Indreberg]]</b>: Likewise.
 (80) Following the voting the Supreme Court gave this